Posts Tagged ‘Boulder Colorado’

Citizens Republic Bancorp CRBC

Friday, August 3rd, 2012

Two weeks ago for the first time in a very long time small regional banks started to show up on our model selection list.  It was refreshing to see them after a half dozen years in financial Siberia and one of them appears will have a very good short term payoff.   Just as in the case of Sun Healthcare in June, we’ve only had a short time to build the position but the position is in place for most client portfolios.

Citizens Republic Bancorp is a small regional bank operating in Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin.

Our client cost basis is in the $17 t0 $18 range which may not seem like much with the stock now trading at $19.17 up $1.53 on the day.  Its the news that matters:  CRBC announced it is hiring JP Morgan to seek a buyer for the bank.

Assuming JP Morgan can find a buyer the big question will be at what price.  Here we have to dig into the financials of the bank:

CRBC Book Value: $26.53

Capital ratios are healthy and non-performing assets are improving.

Over the past three months insiders have purchased 11,200 shares.

Long CRBC

 

The similarities: Moneyball and investing

Monday, April 16th, 2012

It was a cold and snowy day yesterday which isn’t uncommon this time of year in the Rockies, actually many of the heaviest snowfalls of the year occur in April.  But last night I was able to see Moneyball which is movie starring Brad Pitt and based on the experiences of Billy Beane who’s the general manager of the Oakland A’s baseball team.

The movie captured the highs and lows of the A’s 2002 season in which they found themselves losing three key free agents to larger franchises and trying to find a way to cope with the realities of being a franchise with a $35 million dollar payroll competing with teams like the Yankees who at the time had a $120 million payroll.

Due primarily to  one of the strongest unions in the country: the MLB players union, a salary cap on team payrolls is nonexistent and has made for an unfair, unlevel playing field between large market teams (Yankees, Red Sox) and small market teams (Royals, A’s, Padres for example).

Billy had to find a way to replace his stars with players who could contribute enough to make up for the loss in production yet be cheap enough to fit within his payroll.  He simply could refit the roster with high priced free agents or trade for players with large contracts, there was no question he couldn’t expand his player payroll budget.

Baseball has long been a sport in which scouting has played a significant role.  Scouts were frequently older baseball men who used their experience to extrapolate what a young players potential could be.  The process is highly subjective and as in most professional sports, most of the prospects never make to the major leagues let alone be stars.  Billie was tired of hearing the old phrases “he’s built like a ballplayer, a five tool player, a smooth level swing, and he’ll improve with time”.  All Billy wanted to know was: “Can the kid get on base?”  If the kid can’t get on base, be it from a walk or a hit he’s of little use to the team and all the pat phrases from the scouts won’t mean a thing.

While visiting the offices of the Cleveland Indians in an attempt to make a trade his offer is shot down based on a mouth to ear relay of information to the Indians GM from an unlikely looking young man.   This young man was one of the first to use data analysis to formulate opinions on their young players.

This young man catches the eye of Billy Bean because is on the cutting edge of incorporating data or quantitative analysis (QA) to determine if the player had the potential to contribute.  The young man didn’t care if the player could even field his position he only cared about his on base percentage (OBP).

The use of quantitative analysis (QA) in baseball was the brainchild of Bill James.  Eventually the use of QA in baseball spread, even to the large market teams like the Red Sox who in fact are owned by John Henry who is a proponent of QA in managing his hedge fund.  However, to this day the issue of QA is still contested since baseball is an old school sport where change rarely occurs and jobs are entrenched.

But this isn’t really a post about baseball as much as it is a post on the advantages of quantitative analysis in many of life’s endeavors especially investing.

In place of the subjective “it has a great looking chart” / “the stock has a low PE and a 2% dividend and we expect it to move 20% higher this year!” is our proprietary RMHI model that allows us to backtest over a decade of data to determine which balance sheet profiles and stock selection formulas actually work in creating above average shareholder wealth.   Can this stock “get on base?”

In baseball the large market teams are captivated every year by the super stars that hit the free agent market just as investors are fascinated by the attention getting stocks such as Apple.  The past does not equal the future and while the Angels may feel adding Albert Pujols to their roster for an average of $25 million a year till 2021 is a good deal, you must consider he is a richly valued player who is peaking at age 32.  Will he be able to contribute at ages 38 to 41?   For every Ted Williams there are many more Manny Ramirez’s who were done at 38 leaving the team stuck with a dead money contract.

But investors miss the questions they should be asking themselves:  Is my chance of making an above average return on Apple (which sells at 17x 2012 eps, 4.4 times revenue and 6x book value) better going forward than shares of a stock selling 9x 2012 earnings, 0.46 times revenue and .75 times book value).  This is the essence of Moneyball or as a wise man once said to me “Price is what you pay and Value is what you get”.  FYI the unnamed stock is Voxx International, symbol VOXX.

And the Oakland A’s won their division in 2002 with a better record than the year before.

Long VOXX

 

Investing in 2012 will likely be very profitable

Thursday, February 9th, 2012

Despite a terrific first quarter, 2011 morphed into a miserable year as the combination of US political bickering and misplaced worry over the prospects of a European debt contagion caused both professional and individual investors to flee to ultra safe alternatives.   What made 2011 especially maddening was that investors who did stick with equities chose to hold their assets in the Dow 30 stocks which became almost bond surrogates at the expense of small and mid cap equities.  This bifurcated situation created one of the largest spreads ever in performance between the Dow Jones Industrial Index of 30 stocks (+1%) and the Russell 3000 (-7%).

Consistently ignored in second half of 2011 was improving domestic economic data:  Improvements in Housing, Consumer Confidence, Auto Sales and Jobs was ignored by the deafening, attention grabbing headlines from Europe.   Corporate earnings which are the primary driver of stock prices continued to grow at an approximate 10% pace and look to repeat this performance in 2012.

Despite the improving data, the consensus of opinion amongst investors is gloomy and that is where I believe the opportunity for 2012 is.   Professional and individual investors have abandoned equities with a ferocity unseen since 2008 and are settling for yields in Treasuries in the 2% range.  Simply put, at a yield of 2% it will take 36 years for the principal to double in value.

Investors having sold heavily in the second half of 2011 have likely discounted the bad news from Europe and the unfounded fears of a US recession.   I seriously doubt renewed fears of European recession or budget issue can muster a second similar selloff.  Domestic and European issues are well known and have a likely probability of diminishing in consequence.

It’s a frequently commented upon topic that the consensus view of economics and investing will usually be the strategy that bites you the hardest since it’s rare that the consensus view actually comes to fruition.  Investing would be quite easy if that was the case, since you could simply find what the prevailing opinion was and invest accordingly.

For 2012 I offer what I believe will be five minority/contrarian views that have a better than average chance of being accurate in 2012.

1.  The stock market has a very good year and our models and client portfolios have a very good year.   The long term top of 1500 on the S&P 500 is a very good possibility by 2013 as

investors realize the fear driven mistakes of 2011 and move assets from bonds back to equities.   A Romney victory would likely be a significant market positive (I am a Democrat) and could propel stocks to 1500 sooner than expected.  Newt, on the other hand would likely be a major market headwind while the re-election of President Obama (the likeliest possibility) would be a moderate positive for stocks.

Investors who shunned small and mid-cap sized equities in favor of Index mutual funds and bonds had either minute gains or losses while the vast majority of Value portfolios had a terrible 10 months.  The biggest groups of investors: Institutional, Hedge Funds and especially Individual investors are very poorly positioned with very high allocations to cash, gold and bonds.

It’s my belief that 2012 will be a year of mean reversion, where the investments that performed poorly in 2011 will produce outsized gains while bonds post negative returns and Indexes lag managed portfolios by a wide degree.

The 50 year average yield on the 10-year Treasury note is 6.6% and now its 2% while the 50 year average multiple on stocks is 15 times earnings, now it is at 12.

As mentioned in my blog previously:  The US market risk premium (earnings yield minus the risk free rate of return) is at a 37 year high.  This is another statistical metric highlighting the unusual value and upside potential in equities at present.

2.  Treasury bonds will post negative returns in 2012. 

I expect 10 year Treasury bond yields to rise in excess of 3.25% resulting from an expanding economy and less worldwide fear.   The decline in bond values should provide the impetus for an asset allocation shift away from bonds and into stocks.

3. There will be no recession in the US and we will have at least one quarter where our GDP growth is in excess of 3%.   Earnings growth in 2012 remains at a moderate 10% growth rate and the US Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged which is very friendly to a rising stock market.

4.   President Obama is re-elected.  In my opinion the President’s electability will have much to do with the comparative un-electability of the Republican opposition.  Be it Romney, Gingrich, Paul or Santorum, they all have major comparative flaws and would be hard pressed to gain the important Moderate electorate.  If I’m wrong and Romney is elected, there is the possibility of reaching 1500 on the S&P 500 earlier than expected as his election would be viewed as a market positive.

5. The European Union will not crash.  Problem solving in Democracies is almost always a messy proposition.  Seamless and definitive political decisions are the hallmark of Authoritarian rule.   Only until a crisis is upon the decision makers do they generally drop their political biases and come to an agreement.  I don’t think that there will even be a defining moment when the Euro crisis has been solved; it will be from a series of decisions and actions rather than an all encompassing point in time.

Deep discounted financing (loans provided by central banks at very low interest rates) worked in 2008 to avert our banking crisis and they will likely work again for Europe.  The import issue is that their banks simply get financing, the rate is of secondary importance.

Investment Status:  Equity markets at present are in excellent shape with all major US indices breaking out to new rally highs. I believe it’s quite possible that that the rally will continue for several more months at least and that 1500 on the S&P 500 are attainable.  As you can see in the chart below the SPX has been making a series of higher lows since September but our portfolios really began to out-perform in early December.

Another positive factor for equities over the next several months is that volatility continues to subside.   This is necessary for investors to feel secure to deploy funds into equities and is frequently common in the early stages of new market rallies.

One of the biggest factors that I see driving markets higher in 2012 is that the alternative investments, particularly money market funds, CD’s and US Treasury Bills all pay under 1%.  Should markets continue to move higher there will be a tremendous amount of cash coming out of those investments to seeking a higher rate of return.  Investors may actually panic at the thought of being left out while their present fixed income returns so little.

All in all I expect that 2012 will result is a good year for our clients.   Investor expectations are virtually nil and the masses have parked a huge amount of capital in ultra low yielding money markets and short term bonds.  1% returns are not going to help anyone in their retirement or capital growth plans.  If equity markets continue to show strength and reduced volatility I do expect a very large asset allocation swap out of low-risk investments and into equities.  Regarding equities, I am especially in favor of equities that had a rough year in 2011 due to their expected better than average risk / reward rather than the much beloved darlings like Apple and Google.

RMHI Model:  There was no surprise that our investment model took a beating last year.   Since my own retirement accounts are invested in the model as well, I can certainly identify with investor pain.

 

The chart above is the hypothetical back-test of the RMHI model (without hedging) dating back to 2001 till the first week of 2012.   Actual client portfolios have tracked very closely to the chart below and while 2011’s decline was severe the performance began to curl higher in December. The chart is divided into thirds and the blue line is the S&P 500, which appears as a simple flat line over 10 years due to its lack of net progress.

The best way to gauge the model will be to track its progress during our current rally and all appears positive at this present time.  As of today (1/23/2012) equity portfolios year to date are up an average of 7.5% net of fees and expenses versus 3% for the S&P 500.

 

All in all, I expect a good to very good year.

 

Brad Pappas

 

This letter does not constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services or attempt to effect securities transactions in any state or jurisdiction where such an offer or the provision of such services would be prohibited. Such an offer can only be made in states where we are registered or where an exemption from registration exists. The purpose of this letter is solely for the dissemination of general information on products or services. Investment advice or the rendering of investment advice for compensation will not be made absent of compliance with the state investment advisor requirements. For information concerning the licensure status or disciplinary history of an investment advisor a consumer should contact their state securities law administration. The information contained on this website should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Rocky Mountain Humane investing expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this letter. Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, Corp. does not warrant the accuracy of the materials provided herein, either expressly or impliedly, for any particular purpose and expressly disclaims any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, Corp. will not be responsible for any loss or damage that could result from interception by third parties of any information made available to you via this site. Although the information provided to you on this site is obtained or compiled from sources we believe to be reliable, Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, Corp. cannot and does not guarantee the accuracy, validity, timeliness or completeness of any information or data made available to you for any particular purpose.

Whats the Top Stock Market Strategy of the past 50 years?

Monday, December 19th, 2011

Its been no secret that 2011 has been a difficult year.  A year that can make you doubt everything you’ve ever learned, tested and retested our models countless times even on vacation.  (I refuse to allow the glare of the sun on the beach disable my ability to read our strategy test results on my Ipad.  I know, that’s pretty pathetic.)

It should be a given to any investor that no strategy works wonderfully all the time, 2011 is enough to prove that.   Long term investing has more to do with perseverance and discipline to your strategy regardless of your emotions and the market environment.   With persistence,  in the long run you should do quite well.

I’ve never made it a secret that I’ve been a fan of James O’Shaughnessy and his book:  “What works on Wall Street”.  The RMHI investment model is based on Shaughnessy’s “Trending Value” model but interpreted for Socially Responsible Investors.

But more importantly what strategy has worked the best for the past 50 years?

Well, Shaughnessy has released a new paper on “Trending Value” and it has trounced every other model that I’m aware of for the past 50 years.

“Its annualized return of 20.58% through Sept. 30 crushes the All Stocks benchmark (an equally weighted benchmark of stocks with an inflation adjusted market cap great than $200 million), which has a return of 10.71%. Plus, the Trending Value approach achieves its return with a volatility of 17.69%, lower than the benchmark’s 18.26%.

“The strategy makes use of one of the main innovations from the book: the use of a composite value factor. In the original publication, we identified price-to-sales as the most effective value factor. In this latest edition of the book, we have learned that a composite that combines several different value factors delivers stronger returns and more consistency than any individual factor.

By spreading our bets and ensuring that a stock is cheap in a variety of ways, we believe we can identify better stocks. One version of the composite value factor combines the following measures of value:

• Price-to-Sales

• Price-to-Earnings

• Price-to-Book

• Price-to-Cash Flow

• EBITDA/Enterprise Value

• Shareholder yield (dividend yield + rate of share repurchases)”

Now this gets interesting since RMHI has been using a composite model since the beginning of our model based strategy.   It would be fair to say that we were one step ahead of Mr. O’Shaughnessy but now the gap is closing and I find that confirmation of research affirming our strategy a major confidence boost in a difficult environment.

Significant differences remain between O’Shaughnessy’s model and our own.  Its impossible to know what the weighting of each criteria are since they have not been provided.   In addition, the O’Shaughnessy model focuses on only holding stocks ranked in the top 10% of their ranking system while we have found that holding the top 1% versus the top 10% over time sharply improves returns.

Chart courtesy of American Association of Individual Investors

It should be noted at this time that O’Shaughnessy does not have a public fund that exclusively advertises itself as “Trend Value” but many of the stocks highlighted on AAII as acceptable to the TV and included in his “Tiny Titans” screen are also stocks found in our portfolios in the recent past:

Material Sciences
Core Molding Technology
Datalink
Town Sports International – current RMHI long position

While its obvious to see that the volatility of the portfolio is greater than that of the S&P 500 the returns more than make up for it in the long run.

 

All the best,

Brad

Long CLUB

 

Market turn approaching?

Wednesday, December 14th, 2011

This may be premature but I’ve noticed that our portfolios have been outperforming for the past three days.   That may not sound like much but I believe its an indication that the breadth of the market is improving and that the major indices are masking underlying strength.

When underlying market strength is weak, the major indexes that you can own via ETF’s or Index mutual funds tend to do relatively well.  However, when underlying strength is weak there is a strong tendency for individual equities and small caps to outperform.  This could be the case now, time will tell.   It has been 10 months since we last outperformed so the tide may be turning.

We continue to hold Appliance Recycling Centers of America ARCI Green Plains Renewable Energy GPRE and have a small position in Perma Fix Environmental Solutions PESI.

Severe sell off in solar play First Solar FSLR a former high flying darling of the solar energy industry.   FSLR came out with a statement that 2012 earnings will be roughly half of analysts expectations.   We have no position in FSLR but I must say the price is getting interesting.

FSLR share price is $33.90

The balance sheet is solid: Book value is $46 which includes $8 in cash and the equivalent of approximately $7 in debt.

But the market cap is now below revenues, which indicates very good value.

Its probably too early to buy as the stock needs to stabilize and the source of the earnings weakness must be determined.  Stating again for the umpteenth time:  Europe is the primary source of Alt Energy revenues and Europe is cutting back severely through austerity programs to curb their debt.  Alt Energy will be sacrificed in the meantime as for most countries its a discretionary expense.

Long ARCI, PESI and GPRE

 

 

Appliance Recycling Centers of America

Friday, November 11th, 2011

Top of the list for a Green company – ARCI

Micro Cap stock with all the ingredients we love to see:

Price/Sales: .27
Price/Earnings: 7
Quarterly Earnings Growth: 30%
12 mos. Trailing EPS Growth: 87%
Earnings Yield: 10.7%
With better than average trading momentum

 

We are long ARCI for client accounts

Potential retest of the August low

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Right now the SP 500 is selling off hard to 1126 down 40 points on the day in response to Fed’s remarks yesterday.   While they see the weakness in our economy and the growing risks in Europe they’re willing to do little at this point.   I must admit to feeling much better hanging on to our SDS hedges and not getting sucked into the rally last week, as this is a moment I’ve anticipated.

The SP500 is near the bottom of its trading range of 1100 to 1230 and this morning I’ve sold our SDS hedge for $25.41.

While the economy is weak the consensus opinion is that the US is already in recession, but this may not be the case:  The Conference Boards leading economic index (LEI) rose .3% for the fourth straight month, expectations were for a .1% gain.  The Conference Board put the chances of a recession at less than 50% but also suggested risks were rising.

The Ned Davis Economic Timing index has dropped but still remains at a level consistent with modest economic growth.

In addition, the FHFA purchase only housing price index rose .8% in July and while it remains 3.3% below its reading of a year ago it could be showing early signs of stabilization since this is the highest reading of 2011.

Investor sentiment is dismal, no doubt there but one must keep an objective eye on the data.   While many consider the Fed’s lack of action as a negative, in my opinion the ball is really in the court of our political leaders.  Fiscal policies are likely to have a greater impact on our economy than monetary policy.  Monetary policy in balance sheet deleveraging economies is essentially pushing on a string since there is little loan demand.  Individuals and corporations are saving capital rather than spending, hence you could drive rates down to 1% across the board and still see little ripple effect.

Lastly, from a technical viewpoint the early August low saw over 1200 stocks on the NYSE make new annual lows.  At present the number is 735 which is a positive divergence and an early sign that selling could be exhausting itself.

While this smells acts and trades like a Bear Market, the news is not completely awful, just partially disgusting.  Hence, based on my short term trading models we’re at a short term extreme and a bounce should be expected.  Till proven otherwise we remain in a 1230 to 1100 trading range.

Brad

No positions

What I know and what I wish I knew

Thursday, September 15th, 2011

A short while back I decided to return to writing on the blog as a way to encapsulate my thoughts and review tactics and strategies.   With the noise that exists within our culture and data driven industry we can lose ourselves to the impulses caused by the most recent data points.

The talking heads on TV uniformly speak with such clarity and conviction but are never held accountable to the results of their recommendations.  Do they eat their own cooking the way I do?  I doubt it very much.   So while you the reader may consider that this blog is for your benefit please consider its also for my benefit at well.

What do we know:

The political leadership existent within the US and Globally lacks the political will and savvy to solve the debt and currency crisis.   There is a continual sense that their intentions are to “kick the can down the road” for future leaders and tax payers.  The lack of cross the aisle cooperation between parties is pathetic.  The Republican’s lack of cooperation, even at the cost of benefit to the country in order to gain the White House appears to be the game plan.  Speaker Boehner is even disagreeing with the proposed short term tax credits proposed in the jobs bill.

If you’re a country that cannot print money then you are crashing.  Why this is lost upon the tea party, I have no idea.

There is a global race to devalue currencies.  PIMCO predicts the Euro will fall to 1.20 USD within three to six months.   When Janene and I were in Paris this May the Euro was 1.45 USD.

2012 estimated earnings for the SP 500 are coming down in deliberate fashion.   In August the estimate for 2012 was $112, now they are at $110 and falling.

Most European stock markets are down 15%-20% while the US is down 2% for the year.    Macroeconomic data continues to deteriorate.   Last night Goldman Sachs lowered their end of the year target for the SP500 to 1250 down from 1400.

Investors are extremely bearish.  AAII figures show 40% bears against 30% bulls.  This is an uncomfortable status in light of my hedged positions.   The issues of Greece, the Euro, our budget impasse, US debt, falling currencies and high odds of recession appear to be largely baked in the cake of many share prices.

Shares of dividend paying stocks look very attractive relative to bonds.

Contrary to Bernanke’s talk:  US money supply is rising.  Rising money supply frequently has a steroid effect in the short term for stock prices to move higher.

With Peyton Manning on the sidelines is there is no doubt that Tom Brady is simply the best at his position.

What I don’t know:

How low will SP 500 earnings estimates fall before they bottom?   The average recession cuts earnings by 25% from the previous peak or in our case $75 a share.

While a Greek default is inevitable, can Europe handle a Greek default in an orderly fashion, and then an Italy default, followed by a Portugal default……..rinse and repeat.

Will the Chinese support the Euro to allow multiple currency options for its growth.

Can the European banks reduce their systemic risks and raise gigantic amounts of capital they require?

One potential cure-all would be for the Chinese to let the Yuan trade freely on its own merits?  Is this just pie in the sky hopin and wishin?

Will investors finally purge Treasuries en masse and allow yields to rise?

Is our unemployment issue systemic (see Doug Kass) or cyclical (Paul Krugman)?

Can the opinions expressed by Tim Geithner in stating there will be no Euro Lehman’s be trusted?

How can Duane Allman and BB King be ranked higher than Eric Clapton in the Rolling Stone Top 100 guitarists of all time.  I’ve adored Live at the Fillmore East since I was a kid and Riding with the King is superb but shouldn’t the breadth of work by Clapton be considered?

 

Long Clapton

 

Whipsaws galore

Friday, August 12th, 2011

After a major market pullback the natural reaction might be to just hang in their for the follow up rally, but not so fast.   Market bottoms are a process not a point in time.  What I mean is that we may have made a bottom in equities on Monday but the odds are very high that we’re going to have a period of at least a few months to finally exhaust all the sellers.  Markets will likely be whipped around like a puppy’s chew toy and I’d rather keep volatility to a minimum.

In the meantime scenes we’re likely to see:

Failure of a major European bank – Its not like they’re going to give a heads up notice.  When you start banning short selling you know you’re in a losing battle.

2012 US earnings estimates: They haven’t budged at all.   They stand now at $111 for 2012.   Despite a plethora of weak economic stats the numbers haven’t moved down at all.  They must come down to reality before they can be trusted.   The downward revision process will likely be painful if you’re heavily invested in equities.

Commencement of QE3:  So far the QE process has been a complete bust.   But thats about the only arrow the Fed has in its quiver to aid the economy and its a loser……unless you own precious metals and then its manna from heaven.

While risk at the moment may not be very large, the prospects for Intermediate term gains in equities isn’t rosy either.  This is not the time to be excessively bullish or bearish for equities.   In the meantime we have lots of cash on hand and in many accounts the long equities are balanced by Gold, Silver, Swiss Franc’s and the SDS.

Gold and Swiss Franc’s still too hot for new money and needs to cool off.  Silver is frustrating but could rally.

Happy Friday

Long SDS, GLD, SLV, FXF

 

 

Adding S&P 500 Inverse ETF’s

Thursday, August 11th, 2011

Not since 2009 have I purchased an Inverse Exchange Traded fund but with this absurd volatility I see the opportunity for a trade in the SDS at $24.71.

We may have been up 500 points in the afternoon but nothing is resolved and the Presidents press conference was as politically biased as ever, not what we need.  I still think this is part of the bottoming process assuming a bottom is in place which is in doubt.

Long SDS

Brad