Last night before heading off to bed I checked the overnight futures market to see we were down 10 on the SP 500. This made sense given the new and potentially increasing trade war with China. (Gee ya think a trade war with China is a good thing since we need the kindness of strangers to buy our Treasuries?)
If this market were in true Bear mode we’d probably have added to the loss of 10 points, given the news. If you went to bed Short or in cash you’d be sleeping smugly……but don’t look now as we’re actually up 5. What Chinese Trade selloff?
Look, there are lots and loads and bunches of reasons to hate this market. Baskets of reasons to say: “We’ve run too far too fast” or “the market has disconnected from our reality” and I wouldn’t disagree with you. In fact, the Bearish reasons always sound more intelligent and thought out than astandard Bullish argument which always has a tendency to sound either insane (A Bull Market Birther: Show me the birth certificate for this Bull Market) or SweetSallySunshine.
Whats undeniable is that Central Bankers round the world are putting massive amounts of cash into their systems, and while banks may not be lending that doesn’t mean they’re not investing. Managers that I have enormous respect for are getting poked in the eye each time they lay out a new series of Shorts. I just have to wonder if they might actually enjoy the pain so self inflicted?
My point is….as I usually do have a conclusive point: The market at this point in time is eerily similar to other periods of economic transition such as 2003, major selloffs are not to be found. My most optimistic guess from this Spring was no major weakness till the first quarter of 2010. Until proven otherwise….that might be the correct path to assume.
On a side note: There is a flip side that’s not so endearing to years of forest fire prevention and trimming: Mountain Pine Beetles. I have hundreds of trees on my land and this year will lose at least a dozen old Lodgepole and Ponderosa Pines. It breaks your heart to see a 150 or 250 year old tree that is doomed and must be cut down. Somehow you always wonder by cutting it down in an effort to save the surrounding trees are you doing the right thing? Without a doubt the answer is always yes. The MPB seems to be natures way of saying “if you’re not going to allow fires and harvesting to take out your old trees I’ll give you a bug of mass destruction.”
We’re a small private investment manager of the traditional variety. By saying we’re Traditional I mean that we don’t use shift the responsibility of investment management to mutual funds or other third party investment management firms, which add on extra layers of fees. By Traditional we mean that we actually do our own security analysis and portfolio trading and allocation with Charles Schwab as our primary custodian of client assets, we don’t take custody of assets. This was how most investment managers practiced when I first broke into the business in 1982 but with the emergence of Financial Planning and Mutual Funds the layers of fees and responsibilities created greater distance from the manager to the portfolio.
We have a deliberate bias for looking at small cap and micro cap investments for three primary reasons:
1. Small companies are more likely to be mispriced or undervalued relative to large cap peers. For example, Apple has at present 34 brokerage firm analysts following the company. Every bit of data produced by the firm is analyzed, frequently to the extreme. Its extremely difficult to maintain an edge under that type of scrutiny. However for the Small Cap companies we follow and invest in its not uncommon to have zero to 1 analyst following the firm. By following companies well below the analyst radar screens the scarcity of information can create opportunities we hope to exploit for our clients.
This is hardly a knock against investing in Large Cap companies as it is our desire to have some sort of advantage when investing. While Apple may continue to provide significant gains for its shareholders, the stock does sell at 29 times current earnings and the opportunity to have a competitive advantage over our peers is minimized by valuation and intense coverage.
2. The advantage of being small: Being that RMHI is a small investment management firm I deliberately decided to use our small size to our advantage. As investment firms get larger over time they’re forced to move up the scale with investments they consider. A firm that focused on Small Caps during their early years is forced to consider Mid to Large Caps as their assets expand over time.
Simply put, we can consider investment stakes in companies that larger firms cannot consider. This is especially important for the Socially Responsible Investor since many terrific Green Technology companies are $50 million to $200 million in capitalization, too small for most managers. Secondly, our small size allows us to still invest in Healthcare through benign service providers without resorting to Healtcare investments within the S&P 500 Index.
Our identification of RINO Intl. (RINO) before it even gained admission to NASDAQ while it was selling at just 4x 2009 earnings is a classic example. At the time of our spotting the stock at $4 a share the capitalization was just approximately $100 million and thus too small for most managers or even many mutual funds to consider.
