RMHI Client Letter, December 2025

“If you wait till you have all the information the battle is lost”

Admiral Raymond Spruance at the battle of Midway.

Stock valuations are higher than ever before including 1929, 2000 and 2007. Assuming an investor buys and holds an S&P 500 index fund when the stock market was valued at 23x earnings, the 10-year average rate of return range falls to +2% to -2%. However when US stocks are selling at 25x earnings the 10- year return was negative.

When market valuations eventually revert (as they always do) lower, the losses will be huge and life altering.

RMHI does not blindly believe in buy and hold, especially when markets are at extreme valuations.

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

My expectation is that over the next 10 years there will be several significant declines and several rallies. In other words a choppy decade for stocks.

This is the reason why there has been above average activity in client accounts as I’ve reduced stock market risk.

The peak last month looks deceptive as it was not a reflection of the average stock making new highs aka “Rising tide raises all boats”. It was based on the strategy of “Invest in AI or go home”. Meaning that the momentum of AI related stocks was alone in propelling the market higher.

If an investor was of the opinion that AI has such a long way to go and to sell now is foolish. That investor may be right but history is replete with mass hysteria of believing “trees will grow to the sky”.

On October 15, 1929 Yale’s Irving Fisher infamous claim: “Stock prices have what looks like a permanently high plateau”. Just 9 days later on October 24, 1929 was “Black Thursday” when the stock market lost 11% of its value on the opening bell with further losses in the weeks following.

In recent times “We see no indications in the marketplace that the radical internet business transformation…is slowing – in fact we believe it is accelerating globally.” John Chambers Cisco Systems CEO August 2000. “…we experienced parts shortages because of industrywide capacity constraints and unprecedented demand for our communications products.” Agilent CEO November 2000.

Based on momentum we have experienced during the first nine months and the strong order backlog , we continued to expect that our growth in 2000 over 1999 will be in the low 40%’s.”

Nortel October 2000 press release Nortel filed for bankruptcy January 2009.

Agilent didn’t go out of business but sold its original electronics business.

Cisco Systems exists today. Cisco’s stock price peaked at $53 in 2000 and fell to $5 in 2002. It did regain its 2000 market price once again…..in 2021.

Blackwell sales are off the charts, and cloud GPUs are sold out”. “We entered the virtuous cycle of AI. The AI ecosystem is scaling fast”. Nvidia CEO November 2025.

A reminder that former tech leaders usually don’t see the cliff ahead.

All the quotes above are Bubble-Speak. These quotes only speak of demand for products and do not reflect the profitability of the end users. If the end users profitability is as poor as current estimates are pointing then the manufacturers will face price competition since demand will be reduced and eventually less expensive providers will come to the forefront. All the while AI could continue to be of great service.

These Bubble cycles eventually do pop and the history of these cycles goes back hundreds of years.

It remains to be seen what will happen to AI investments going forward but such effusive language should generate concern and caution for those old enough to have been around in 2000.

Consider insider selling at Nvidia: in the past six months there have been 527 sales by insiders totaling $1,906,942,689. Source: Dataroma

Below is the Aggregate Market Value Index from Currentmarketvaluation.com. It’s a composite of several valuation methods which show a correlation to future returns.

It states we are two standard deviations above historical valuation norms. It’s not a short term timing model but provides a macro perspective on risk/reward. There has never an era where such an extended market valuation produced positive forward returns for extended periods of time.

At times like this, minimal or risk free returns on Treasury bonds or high quality bonds become a better alternative for extended time periods. As the old bromide goes: “better a modest return on capital than the risk of capital returned.”

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

What else is concerned about? The slowing economy and growing unemployment.

Recessions are difficult to predict but we are heading that way. We’ve already reached the point where growing unemployment usually leads to recessions. But, AI infrastructure spending is close to 50% of GDP. Without AI spending we would likely already be in recession.*. AI may contributed to close to 50% of US GDP growth in the first half of 2025. Source: BCA Research

Kevin Hasset is the front runner to be the new head of the Federal Reserve and he has been vocal for aggressive interest rate cuts. In my opinion this may be the reason why stocks continue to move higher. And, aggressive rate cuts are likely positive for Gold.

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

The trend in unemployment growth is concerning. Because of the government shutdown October employment data will not be published.

Below is the Unemployment data from the Federal Reserve. Notice the move higher on the far right of the chart that has historically evolved into a recession.

Since we are nearing the end of the tax year, taxes must be taken into consideration. Many of the recent trades were to capture tax losses to offset gains from earlier this year. Losses are taken in both taxable and unaffected non taxable accounts at the same time.

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

Shares of Applovin, Robinhood, O’Reilly Auto were taken in whole. Partial gains were taken in some of the more volatile names such as Arista, Amphenol, Broadcom, Celestica, Comfort Systems, Interdigital and Sterling. All of these stocks have AI exposure and are likely overvalued but they continue to power higher.

Since stocks are quite overvalued I have cut our exposure and have been seeking high quality bonds and treasuries.

Recently I added a 5-year Treasury to portfolios with a yield of 3.48% but I’m also looking for safe yields higher than what Treasuries offer.

Adding Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF Symbol JAAA: This is a AAA rated (the US is AA rated) Collateralized Loan Obligations.

This Exchange Traded Fund is a very conservative alternative to Treasuries. It pays a present yield of 5.49%.

The fund buys the highest rated loans which are “floating rate”. Floating Rate means the interest rate on the loan will change according to the direction of interest rates. This prevents the ETF from losing value should interest rates rise. Since its of the highest rating possible with low downgrade or interest rate risk its a worthy alternative to Treasuries.

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

The chart above shows the trading history of JAAA. Note that in the market weakness of 2020 the fund sold off by about 5% at its worst. This can be due to several factors unrelated to the fund. Most of the time its from funds needing to raise cash. These periodic weak periods are excellent buying opportunities.

Adding Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF symbol JSI: It invests in very high rated securitized bonds. They primarily own bonds from Fannie Mae aka Federal National Mortgage Association. Current yield is 5.79%.

Socially Responsible Investing, Vegan Investing

Following The Money

Money tends to flow to assets that offer better reward potential. The decline of the US dollar is causing funds to leave the U.S. in search of better opportunities.

According to Seabreeze Partners AI investing represents 42% of the S&P 500 index. So if the AI trade is showing signs of fraying the volatility could become severe in the U.S..

Under the radar is the fact that Latin American stock markets are having a very good year propelled by the weak USD. Brazil in particular. In Latin America the valuations of their markets are at a fraction of the U.S. Brazil trades at 8x earnings compared to 25x for the U.S.

So I’ve added three essential stocks from Latin markets. And, back to Constellation Software which is Canadian.

By “essential” I mean non cyclical companies that provide basic services with reliable revenues and earnings.

America Movil symbol AMX: We’ve owned AMX before in the early 2000’s. They provide telecommunications services to Latin America and internationally.

Companhia De Saneamen symbol: SBS. SBS provides basic water and sanitation services in Brazil for the San Paolo state. Founded in 1954 and it has been a stellar performer for a very long time. I’ve followed them for years waiting for an opportunity which has now presented itself.

Nu Holdings symbol: NU, Nu provides a digital banking platform in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Cayman Islands and the U.S. Revenues for NU have been growing exponentially since they went public in 2018. NU became profitable in 2023 and has a stellar 27% return on capital.

Constellation Software symbol: CNSWF. Constellation has endured the deepest price pullback in its history. Shares peaked in May at $3996 and a bottom may be in place at $2235.

Reasons for the selloff were two fold: The quick resignation of founder and CEO Mark Leonard for health reasons. And, the theory that AI will transform software creation making Constellation irrelevant. Since the shares have declined by 52% and if a peak in AI investing is occurring shares of Constellation would rebound in 2026. If it falls to new lows I’ll sell.

Quick Summary: I’m expecting U.S. stocks to revert back to normal valuations at some point. I think its a fools game to try to wait till the last minute because we never know when that minute is occurring.

Prolonged Bear Markets in U.S. stocks do have significant rallies to participate in as long as you kept your funds and psyche intact. In the 2000 Internet bubble an excellent and prolonged rally occurred from 2003 to 2007. Similar rallies occurred in the 1930’s and 1970’s.

My goal is to find the acceptable investments during what is likely to be a difficult future for stocks.

Gold and Silver, high quality international stocks plus safe Treasuries and other bond ETF’s are likely at the front of the list.

Thank you for reading.

Brad Pappas

12/3/25

Disclaimer: The purpose of this letter is solely for the dissemination of information investment products or services. Investment advice or the rendering of investment advice for compensation will not be made absent of compliance with the state investment advisor requirements. For information concerning the compliance status or disciplinary
history of advisor or firm the consumer should connate their state securities law administration. 

The information contained in this letter and email should not be construed as a financial or investment advice for any subject matter. Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, Corp. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on or any of the information on this email.

As always, past performance is no guarantee of future success or returns. In fact future returns may be negative or unprofitable. Accounts managed by RMHI are not diversified. Meaning they own less companies than a diversified fund. Thus the portfolios may be more exposed to individual stock volatility than a diversified fund.

RMHI Client Letter, March 2025

Curbing Our Enthusiasm

This past December and January I became quite concerned that a significant market top was forming in US stocks. This was quite a change since I’d been positive for over the past two years.

RMHI manages client assets with a process designed to reduct risk and preserve account valuations when the odds are high for a significant market decline. Alternatively, we increase stock exposure when markets begin to show positive trends. We are not short term oriented and our ideal is to own a core group of stocks during an entire cyclical bull market run.

I recently was talking to my realtor as we are in the process of selling our home in Allenspark. He told me that he began to buy stocks in the early 1980’s and has never sold any since. I complimented him but told him that he is the exception to the rule. The average investor eventually reaches a level of fear then panics and sells during periods of great stress in declining markets. This is not a plan but a reaction that leads to eventual failure if done repeatedly.

Our process is in place to increase the odds of investor success by protecting their account values during major market turns. I want everyone to be a success story.

Based on my data I believe US markets are in the midst of potential 25%-30% decline. My slow moving monthly models have turned negative. It will take several months for them to turn positive so patience is very important. The average Bear market for stocks is approximately 9+ months. In other words, based on my data I don’t think this is a garden variety market selloff.

Markets and investors need a sense of stability going forward. Obviously this is not the case at present. My guess is that markets are discounting a future of instability and irrational behavior from Trump.

At present we have sharply reduced our equity exposure: Spotify, Broadcom, Cintas, Arista, FICO, Microsoft, Nvidia, Comfort Systems, Meta, Moody’s, Mastercard and Vertiv Holdings have been sold. We remain holders of: Constellation Software.

We have approximately 9% exposure to stocks. The only additions have been an increase in US Treasuries and Gold in client accounts. Gold is a hedge against currency devaluation in the USD. Plus, an ancient form of currency during crisis.

Bitcoin is rapidly losing its potential and reputation except to the zealots. The manipulation by the new administration is so plainly obvious. Bitcoin is a risk asset and has not shown an ability to hold value during market duress. Bitcoin promoters like Michael Taylor of Microstrategy only offer self-serving cheerleading opinions to bring in new buyers.

What strikes me is how deliberate this potential economic downturn is being generated. It’s a deliberate trashing of the economy. The administration is gaslighting the effects of Tariff’s, as it is plainly a tax. A tax that is inevitably paid by the consumer and not the “government”. 

Its my belief that the combination of austerity measures being enacted by the current President: DOGE, Federal employee layoffs, Tariff’s plus reciprocal Tariff’s, deportations will create a slowdown in growth for the US economy.

These are amongst the most cruel ways to reduce inflation. It appears they want to slow demand in the economy by reducing federal benefits and increasing federal unemployment. These benefits would include federal employment (DOGE) plus cutting Medicare, food assistance and low income housing. 

I do not believe they’re considering or care about the impact of the increased strain on basic assistance programs (which are being cut) which are in place to support the lowest levels of society.

Meanwhile there will be tax cuts, reduced IRS oversight and deregulation.

Four weeks ago the GDPNow forecast was +3.9%. Two weeks ago it was +2.3%. There has to be a certain level of genius to inherit a healthy economy growing between 2% and 3% and plunge to negative growth.

How far a market declines is anyone’s guess. Previous post 2008-09 declines fell to the 200 week moving average for the S&P 500. That would imply a further 17% decline from here.

Goldman Sachs Bull/Bear Indicator is not a timing mechanism but an indication of risk. Stocks are not cheap and there is a disproportionate balance between upside potential and downside risk.

Further evidence of the degree of risk and odds of a significant market decline come from 2023 Charles H. Dow Award Winner Andrew Thrasher, CMT and his “The 5% Canary” study. Canary referring to an early warning indicator.

Thrasher found significant evidence of the relationship between the speed of an initial market decline of 5% and the propensity for much larger declines. In other words, a 5% in 15 days or less led generally led to larger losses going forward.

Red dots in the chart above met the Canary criteria. Fast declines led to predictably increasing losses. Our recent decline met the 5% Canary criteria which predicts more declines to come.

Thank you for reading

Brad Pappas
March 18, 2025

Disclaimer: The purpose of this letter is solely for the dissemination of information investment products or services. Investment advice or the rendering of investment advice for compensation will not be made absent of compliance with the state investment advisor requirements. For information concerning the compliance status or disciplinary
history of advisor or firm the consumer should connate their state securities law administration. 

The information contained in this letter and email should not be construed as a financial or investment advice for any subject matter. Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, Corp. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on or any of the information on this email.

As always, past performance is no guarantee of future success or returns. In fact future returns may be negative or unprofitable. Accounts managed by RMHI are not diversified. Meaning they own less companies than a diversified fund. Thus the portfolios may be more exposed to individual stock volatility than a diversified fund.

Why I Started Rocky Mountain Humane Investing

Why I Started Rocky Mountain Humane Investing

Have you ever wondered how your investments can align with your personal values? At Rocky Mountain Humane Investing, we believe you don’t have to choose between your financial goals and your principles.

In this brief video, I share the story of how my passion for ethical investing led me to start my firm.

Investors may hate taxes but they hate losses more

Recently I’ve seen a few studies and charts on Twitter that lend favor to Tax Efficient Investing. These are portfolios where each holding is designed to be held for more than one year. This stragegy allows them to qualify for reduced taxes as a Long Term Capital Gain. The articles I’ve seen generally advocated by financial planners and advisors who see Tax Efficient Investing as their way to add value or have an edge for the clients of their practice. But not once have I seen a credible article playing the role of Devil’s Advocate for Tax Efficient Portfolios. Today the Dow Jones Index was down 660 points at mid-day. It would seem apropos to highlight a few of the disadvantages of Tax Efficient Investing.

The points I will make are from the perspective of a Growth-oriented investment advisor whose primary investment vehicles are stocks, ETF’s and ETN’s. Municipal bonds are a different animal altogether and not the subject of this blog post.

Are the lower taxes worth the losses?

The primary objective of Tax Efficient Investing is to own an investment for at least 12 months. Our primary objection to this strategy is prioritizing time of ownership over gains. Investment gains can disappear or be significantly reduced by the goal of hanging on for one year. For example, you buy a stock at $50 on January 1, 2017 and perhaps by April 2017 the stock is $65. But by January 2, 2018 the stock could be anywhere. A major sin of investing that you open yourself up to is not taking the gain in April. If the market goes into a sell-off where the stock goes back to $50 or below, your gain has been negated. It reminds me a bit of the game show “Let’s Make A Deal” with Monty Hall. Monty would offer a contestant a sure deal right off the bat, but with the caveat of “Would you be willing to give up the sure deal for whats behind Door 1”. It could be a brand new living room or dinette set (hey I watched it in the 1970’s). It could also be a rusting bucket of used auto parts. At that point Monty would offer the bizarrely dressed contestant the consolation prize of the home version of the game show. Cue sad trombone.

The stock could also have gone to $75 in good market as well, up 50%. If the stock continues to rise without any major setbacks, an experienced Trend Following methodology as well as a Tax Efficient investor would likely continue holding on to the stock. There is a primary difference between a Trend Following system – which we employ – versus a Tax Efficient strategy. We’d take a profit should the stock decline below important benchmarks. Declines below certain sell points raise the question of whether the stock is even in an uptrend. By the way, how hard it is to find a stock that can smoothly rise throughout the entire year? This means the company must produce 4 good earnings reports in a row and not sustain large pullback. 2017 was an easy year for Trend Followers. Even then almost 95% of the stocks we bought could not sustain 12 months of positive performance.

Are the drawdowns tolerable?

In point 1 I discuss a scenario of a single stock. But if Tax Efficiency is the goal along with long term Growth, you can now envision how volatile that portfolio would become. By not exerting proper risk controls, the portfolio would likely have longer and more significant drawdowns. Is that something you really want? Most investors, especially those who are new to investing cannot endure declines of 30% or more to their portfolios. This begs to ask:  “Would you pay a bit more in taxes for less volatility?” In my experience which is based on client retention, the answer is “yes”.  People hate losing money more than paying higher taxes.

What about lagging holdings?

Digging down deeper into portfolio management is the issue of what to do with lagging holdings. A lagging holding is the stock that you have had a gain on, but is now going nowhere. Our view is to sell laggards in a rising market. We don’t see the value of holding an investment unless its producing for you. A major advantage to this is to look for new potential winners. But the Tax Efficient portfolio may hang on to the stock till it clears the one-year hurdle. This is another factor contributing to underperforming portfolios.

To sum it up: Tax Efficient Investing can be a proper strategy for some investors but for most it isn’t. Investment methods must not just make financial sense. The methods must also be cognizant of the investor’s risk profile and emotional impact. One size does not fit all and every investment method has some inherent weaknesses. Most investors would probably feel more comfortable knowing the achilles heel of any strategy.

Cheers,
Brad Pappas

 

October 2017 Client Letter

Enjoy The Ride!
10/19/2017

Since the market bottom last November the S&P 500 has rallied from 2083 to 2560, a very healthy gain of 22.8% not including dividends. Despite these gains there are almost no signs of euphoria within the investing community which leads me to think this rally still has a long way to go.   Euphoria is a necessary evil that’s almost always seen at major market highs when investors refuse to believe the market will roll over.

Is there a valid case to be Bearish? Yes, but market momentum always takes precedence. Eventually the bears will be right but it may take a few more years and in the meantime so much opportunity will be lost. The bearish arguments have been around for years and completely dismissed as markets make new The bear case always sounds intelligent and well thought out but their losses and opportunities missed can be staggering.

This week marks the 17th time in the past 90 years that stocks made new all-time highs each day of the week. In only ONE instance did this ever mark the exact top of the stock market (1968). Higher highs occurred 94% of the time.

Once a trend has been established it tends to persist and run its full course.

Investing always has some form of anxiety for investors to contend with. If it’s not nervousness with the decline in your account value it’s the fear of the value rising too much and worrying you’ll give it all back. Is there a Goldilocks too hot – too cold – just right equivalence? Nope, but keep things simple as in try to sensibly grow your principal as much as possible in the good years and lose as little as possible in the bad. And, try not to mess it up in the meantime which is why: Temperament can more important than intellect.

In past years bonds offered a decent yield which allowed an investor to gain some income and diversify from stocks.   The problem in this era is that yields are very low and in order to gain a modest, even a high single digit return there must be some increase in bond prices and very little of that is happening now.

One of the best books ever written on investing was authored by Jesse Livermore “How to trade in stocks” published in 1940.   At his peak Livermore was worth an estimated $100 million in 1929 dollars after starting from scratch.   His approach was systematic and still effective today and I use many of the rules he originally created for himself.

One of Livermore’s lessons was: “Money is made by SITTING not trading” To paraphrase, when you know you’re in the right you stay invested until the rally fades.   You should remain in the stocks that are trending higher and take small losses along the way (never ride a losing stock down hoping it will turn).

The majority of “easy” money made in stocks is made during two unique phases of the economy/markets: The violent rally higher during the transition from recession to expansion and during long trending rallies in the mid cycle of the expansion like we’re experiencing right now. Smooth trending markets may happen just once or twice in a decade so it’s important to maximize the opportunity when it’s present.

While it’s part of our management philosophy to protect our clients during major down drafts, we do not sell prematurely or pretend that we can call a market top.   “Top Calling” the stock market is a way of gaining media exposure and attention. Top Calling has nothing to do with solid investment management since astute advisors know it can’t be done. The better option is to let the market take us out when the time is right with our built in exposure systems.

Charting the warning signs of the 1987 crash

It’s been 30 years since the 1987 crash so why not look at it closely for lessons?

The evolution of market tops is a gradual process whereby markets weaken as selling and distribution increase. Sometimes the flat sideways trend is nothing more than the “pause that refreshes” before another up-leg commences. However, sideways/choppy trends can also be the early stage of something more ominous.

In the summer of ‘87, the bond market was very weak with declining prices and higher yields which were becoming increasingly more attractive to stocks.   This was causing a migration from stocks which began to manifest itself in August. These were the grand old days when investors wouldn’t buy a municipal bond unless it had a tax free yield of 10% or more.

Stocks peaked in August then sold off by 8% in September then rallied 6% into October before crashing.   The decline in early October breached the 50-100-200 day moving averages which would have triggered a wave of sell signals for us. We always use the 200 day moving average as the ultimate cut off for owning stocks. I consider declines below the 200 day to be Bear Market country.

 

Summary: Enjoy the ride.

Brad Pappas
970-222-2592
Brad@greeninvestment.com

 

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Predicting business cycle peaks

Like so many other investment firms we had to endure the market decline in 2008 but being an independent firm we have the freedom to also say “never again”.   We’ve reached a point in our lives and stomach lining that there had to be precedents before the recession that could provide a heads up if a recession is looming.  In fact, over the years we’ve found many including Inverted Yield Curves written none other than the Federal Reserve.

One thing you’ll notice over time with our blogs or letters is that we’re not opposed to using the research of other firms especially if they blend nicely with our own systems. We have often relied on academic research of others to build upon and couldn’t care less if research results were developed by others.  We always find it a bit small minded that so many firms insist on relying solely on their own research or incredulous when studies that could really help their clients are ignored. Why reinvest the wheel if its already been done by someone else?

Our priority is to develop effective systems which deliver superior results to our clients and not claim that we have a monopoly on great ideas.  We have just a few criteria’s that must be met for inclusion to our own systems.  System should be open (no black boxes) and understandable and best of all, relatively simple. Too many times we look at systems of others that have done a remarkable job in back testing but when you look at the system details there’s a large number of criteria which just makes us think the system has been optimized to inevitable failure.

Things brings me back to Bob Dieli of www.nospinforecast.com

Decades ago Bob developed the Aggregate Spread as a leading indicator of US recessions. The formula is absurdly simple for those inclined: Take the 30-year Treasury bond yield and subtract the yield from the Fed Funds rate. And then take the CPI rate and subtract that from the unemployment rate. Then just subtract the yield spread from the result of the CPI minus the unemployment rate. That will give you the Aggregate Spread.

When the Agg Spread dips below 200 the odds become very high that a recession is expected in the next 9 months. Simply put to you the investor: If you have high probability of advance knowledge of an incoming recession why would you want to own stocks or own stocks un-hedged?

 

AggSpread

 

One of the great things about Bob’s Agg Spread  methodology is that it goes back a long ways, back to the days of Elvis, 1954. Bob has been operating the system since the early 1980’s.  During this time the system algorithm has never been changed either.

While the Agg Spread is not a guarantee of a recession or the ensuing Bear Market in stocks that could cause investors to lose 20% to 40+%.   Using the Agg Spread places the investor into a position of preemptive rather than reactive.   With this type of knowledge investors can have an advanced warning to move at least a portion of their assets out of stocks and into short term Treasuries or hedge the portion of the portfolio close to 1 to 1 that closely correlates to the S&P 500 with the symbol “SH“.

Brad Pappas

No Positions